Skip to content

TRANSFORMING GREENS WAY FOR PEOPLE

Currently, Greens Way is a wide dual carriageway which is difficult for pedestrians and cyclists to cross safely and conveniently, and creates a barrier between the town centre, and the station, canal and other uses further south. Greens Way’s highway capacity far exceeds the amount of traffic it currently carrys (obtained from surveys undertaken in June 2022), which means that space currently given over to traffic lanes could be changed to provide more space for other users, such as cyclists.

Our proposals seek to reduce the current dual carriageway to a single carriageway in each direction. This allows for an active travel corridor located to the north, comprising a two-way segregated cycleway and a footway along the entire length of Greens Way. A continuous footway can also be provided on the south side of Greens Way with new pedestrian crossings proposed at either end, and improved crossings at Station Road and close to Market Street to ensure that accessing the town centre from the south on foot is easy and safe.

Similar ideas were first floated in our earlier engagement and in response concerns regarding traffic congestion were raised. So we have tested the impacts of the proposals using traffic engineering experts Arup. The conclusion from this is the changes will not result in any further significant congestion at either end of Greens Way. Assessment of the roundabouts at either end shows that both could operate with sufficient capacity with a single lane approach, based on current traffic flows even including a 10 year growth in traffic scenario. Lanes were closed on Greens Way during the flyover removal works and this did not have a significant negative impact on the highway network or congestion.

The proposals will result in Greens Way becoming a much safer, less traffic dominated street (opposed to the road it is now), with reduced vehicle speeds and noise, providing an overall more pleasant and attractive environment for everyone, as well as improving connections to the station and the canal. It will help reduce air pollution and contribute to reducing greenhouse emissions, making a contribution toward meeting our climate change targets.



Artist's impression of how a redesigned Greens Way could appear - click to enlarge

Greens Way as existing

Greens Way as existing - click to enlarge
Environmental improvements to the A4 in Slough show how Greens Way could be configured

Environmental improvements to the A4 in Slough show how Greens Way could be configured - click to enlarge

Transforming the street

Within a transformed Greens Way, there is significant opportunity to change how space is used, away from vehicles and towards space for walking, cycling, street trees and planting, and swales – green stormwater drainage spaces that also provide natural habitats.

Greens Way plan

Greens Way sections

Use of planting and trees in streets can provide benefits beyond making them more attractive – they can absorb rainwater through swales (right), provide cooling and shade in the heat, improve air quality and provide biodiverse habitats for nature.

Maintaining traffic flow

Western end of Greens Way, approach to Hartley Street Roundabout

Western end of Greens Way, approach to Hartley Street Roundabout - click to enlarge

Testing and computer modelling work has confirmed that even with a reduction in lanes along much of its length, traffic along Greens Way would still flow smoothly. At each end, two approach lanes to the roundabounts would be maintained to ensure that the junctions had sufficient capacity for current and projected traffic flows.

Eastern end of Greens Way, approach to Adwick Road Roundabout

Eastern end of Greens Way, approach to Adwick Road Roundabout - click to enlarge

Accessing Bank Street

Access to Bank Street

Access to Bank Street - click to enlarge

Since the removal of the Greens Way flyover, vehicle access into the town centre from the east has been more complex. The masterplan proposals for Greens Way include a new right-turn into Bank Street from Greens Way.

Consideration has been given to the potential to provide a new highway link between Greens Way and Bank Street at a similar location to the now removed flyover. However, the level difference between Greens Way and Bank Street means that when the required transitions of 2% over 15m are provided at the either end of the link, the gradient in between would be too steep and significantly exceed the desirable maximum of 5%. Therefore it would not be a suitable location for a vehicle link (or for use by pedestrians or cyclists).

13 responses

On Friday 4th Nov at 21:57, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

Needs dual carriage way

Nobody liked this


On Sunday 6th Nov at 07:12, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

Absolutely terrible idea. Traffic us constantly queued on week days diwn the dual carriageway now teduce that to 1 Lane and no-one is going anywhere. Takes me 15 minutes to get from corner pocket on greens way to the roundabout and back round to access church street. Improve the canal back for walking and cycling. Improving links to / from transpenine trail to Rotherham by all means Improve the footpaths and plant trees but there's enough space at the side of the current road to add a non-necessesary cycle path (that 1 in 30,0000) will use. Pointless waste of money

Nobody liked this


On Sunday 6th Nov at 12:08, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

The dual carriageway is fundamental to traffic flow and must be retained. The Slough picture is ok but its left it still with a dual carriageway.

Nobody liked this


On Sunday 6th Nov at 13:30, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Nobody liked this


On Sunday 6th Nov at 20:14, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

This is ridiculous. I think you traffic survey must have been taken on a Sunday morning in June. Try doing it again between 3-6pm on a weekday and see how far back the queue will be to get to Adwick Road roundabout to see the problems this will cause and the same problem will occur at less peak times too. The two lane approach to the roundabout needs to extend much much further not just the few metres included here Yet again the Council shows it it anti-car. There are pelican crossings for people to use and there are far far fewer people than cars in that area

1 person liked this


On Sunday 6th Nov at 22:50, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly approve

Nobody liked this


On Monday 7th Nov at 21:01, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

There was a bridge for people to cross over to railway station but you removed it. The traffic will be none moving during rush hour with only one lane. The only bikes in that area are pulled out of the canal by magnetic fishing.

Nobody liked this


On Wednesday 9th Nov at 21:01, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly approve

Nobody liked this


On Thursday 10th Nov at 09:40, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I approve

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

I think overall this is an improvement. However carful consideration needs to be taken when considering the local evnvironment and air quality. Reducing the number of lanes for the traffic to flow, will imcrease congestion in peak times. Standing and slowmoving traffic will increase emissions from vehicles locallu. So in actual fact will be detrimental to the public health usung the new green spaces.

Nobody liked this


On Friday 11th Nov at 19:35, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I approve

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

It looks good, just needs properly thinking through with regards to rush hour traffic, particularly queuing towards Doncaster Road

Nobody liked this


On Wednesday 30th Nov at 18:14, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

Making the dual carriageway into a single lane each way for traffic would cause huge traffic queues at peak times. I understand that most of the day there Would be no problem but tea time the road is always congested right down to Doncaster road.  So surely if one lane is removed the congestion would be even worse than it is now. All traffic would be in one lane so the traffic wanting to go up adwick rd would be stuck Queuing with the traffic wanting to go onto Doncaster road. It is nice to have green spaces and cycle lanes but not if it is going to cause problems for people having to drive home from work to be stuck in traffic every night. People are not going to stop using their cars and cycle home or walk unless they work locally. I think it would not make mexborough any better reducing the lanes to two.

Nobody liked this


On Thursday 1st Dec at 23:41, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly disapprove

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

The dual carriageway should not be ousted to fit in a cycleway. It seems like you will change it no matter what we say. Apart from the peak time traffic queues and the pollution caused by standing traffic - what about emergency service vehicles being slowed or even blocked? If you definitely must install a cycleway then leave the town centre side as a dual carriageway with footpath and put a cycleway on the canal side of the dual carriageway. If needed the road lanes could be narrowed to match the narrowing found at the present level crossing. This would give the extra breathing space for the path and planting. The proposed access to Bank Street could remain as shown except it would go over two lanes not one and require a box junction to stop blocked access. The spiritualist church and the adjoining building still need vehicular access to their car parks. Coming off Adwick Road roundabout, traffic could be limited to one lane between the proposed Bank Street turn off and the Leech Lane turn off to give extra room for the cycleway + footpath then the road returning to a dual carriageway. The old access road for the removed flyover bridge needs removing and flattening. This would create more room for a cycleway + footpath and improve the panoramic view from the proposed new park opposite. Keeping it simple the overall cost would be lower eg. making use of existing road lighting, drainage, crossings etc With suitable planning the area around Station Road could be made into a traffic light, controlled junction allowing buses to access the town centre and the rail station in both directions along Greens Way to accommodate a future integrated transport system.

Nobody liked this


On Wednesday 7th Dec at 12:40, someone posted:
What do you think about the proposals for Greens Way?

I strongly approve

Your comments on proposals for Greens Way:

Making it one lane in each direction would stop people overtaking at a very fast speed, and the speed limit should be reduced to 30 from 40m making it safer for the pedestrian crossings to be used and improved environmental suggestions. A more controlled flow will assist drivers as they approach the roundabouts, with signage in place. Pavement improvements along Greens Way would also be appreciated. Good luck!

Nobody liked this